Marihemp - The Marijuana and Hemp Network Information on Spirituality, Drugs, and Herbs
Information on Spirituality, Drugs, and Herbs

[ Boardview ]   [ Threadview ]   [ Quickview ]   [ Topics ]   [ Help ]

US cigarettes v organic cannabis/tobacco
DdC

Registered on
Feb-20-2000
More User Info

Message #4378 posted by DdC (Info) June 01, 2003 03:17:09 ET

What is tobacco ?

Tobacco is the dried leaves of a plant that grows in may parts of the world. Tobacco contains a variety of chemicals, including nicotine which is a drug with a mild stimulant effect. Most tobacco is sold in the form of cigarettes, cigars and pipe tobacco (cigar and pipe tobacco is made from
stronger darker tobacco). A survey conducted in 1988 showed that 32% of people aged 16 or over in the UK smoked cigarettes. This figure is thought to be dropping slightly over time.

Effects of short-term use

Tobacco smoke consists of droplets of tar, nicotine, carbon monoxide and other gases. The amount of nicotine (the main active ingredient) and other substances that is absorbed through the lungs depends on how much and how deeply the smoke is inhaled. Nicotine is a stimulant and smokers feel that tobacco helps relieve boredom and tiredness and also helps reduce stress and
anxiety. The effects are almost immediate but fade quickly, which encourages continual use. Some people may experience nausea and dizziness when they inhale tobacco smoke for the first few times.

Effects of long-term use

The more a person smokes, the more likely they are to suffer from heart disease, blood clots, cancer, strokes, bronchitis, bad circulation and ulcers. Tobacco contributes to around 110,000 premature deaths a year in the UK. Women who smoke during pregnancy are more likely to have smaller babies and run a bigger risk of losing the child before and shortly after childbirth. Tobacco is also likely to cause physical and psychological dependency in a short space of time if it is smoked regularly. People who stop smoking after a period of time are likely to suffer withdrawal symptoms, such as irritability, depression and craving for tobacco.

Legal Status

In the UK it is currently illegal to sell tobacco products to children under 16, although the use of tobacco products by children under 16 is not in itself illegal. However, this law is barely enforced and rarely observed by those who sell tobacco.

********************************************************

Jose Melendez on May 31, 2003
Regulate THIS!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/2951770.stm

US cigarettes 'higher cancer risk' Marlboro is one of the world's most well known cigarette brands Cigarettes made by the US company Marlboro contain a significantly higher level of a cancer-causing chemical than most other foreign brands, US scientists say. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, Georgia, compared the level of the carcinogen nitrosamine in Marlboro cigarettes chosen for their availability across the globe - with local brands in 13 other countries, including Japan and Germany.

It found that in 11 of the countries, the local brands had much lower levels of the chemical than Marlboro cigarettes, in some cases less than half the amount.

CDC officials said that the higher levels were the result of the way tobacco in US cigarettes is cured and blended.

'Reducing harm'

The results, published in the Nicotine and Tobacco Research journal, could indicate that it is possible for manufacturers to lower the levels of the nitrosamine carcinogen in cigarettes, report author David Ashley told the Associated Press news agency.

[The] study is just the most recent example of the tobacco industry's reckless disregard for the health of smokers

Anti-tobacco campaigner Matthew Myers

Philip Morris USA, which produces Marlboro cigarettes, said that it was working with US tobacco growers to reduce the amount of the carcinogen in its product.

"We're trying to find a way to reduce the harm associated with our products by reducing the level of harmful constituents that smokers inhale," spokesman Brendan McCormick said.

'Reckless disregard'

However the CDC warned that nitrosamines are not the only carcinogen found in cigarette smoke, and said that reducing the level of one substance alone "does not guarantee a less hazardous cigarette".

And campaigners said that the study proved the cigarette industry had done little to remove harmful chemicals from cigarettes.

"[The] study is just the most recent example of the tobacco industry's reckless disregard for the health of smokers and yet another compelling reason why cigarettes need to be regulated by the federal government," President of the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids Matthew Myers told Reuters news agency.

More than 400,000 people in the US die each year from diseases caused by smoking, and it is the leading preventable cause of death in the nation, according to CDC...

********************************************************

Organic Cannabis/Tobacco v Chemical Cigarettes

Greetings,

Cigarettes contain added chemicals not in organic tobacco or cannabis. Yet it is still compared by cannabis prohibitionist, and still not mentioned or disclosed by tobacco prohibitionist or producers. Rising prices only hurt the poor who are forced into the black market or into buying generic brands with even more added chemicals. Even if cannabis was compared fairly to tobacco, the fact of its expectorant properties or lung cleaning abilities are seldom mentioned. It is safer to smoke tobacco while using cannabis. It was marketed as a cough elixer and those properties haven't changed. I have found it useful in helping seniors cough up phlegm and clear breathing passages and can't help to think how many kids die in ER's of full blown asthma attacks because of stupid drug policies concerned more with profits and maintaining ignorance over the health and safety of the citizens. Now NAFTA/GATT frees the corporate chemical cigarettes onto the world producing the diseases and illness never known when they used organic tobacco. No rocket surgery here, if you add chemicals to flavor or preserve and ignite them they may cause damage to the body. And if these chemicals aren't added to cannabis then they can't hurt you. Just wondering...
Peace, Love and Liberty vs D.E.A.th Worship
DdC

Cannabis vs tobacco


Tobacco radioactive, cannabis safer...
http://pub3.ezboard.com/fendingcannabisprohibitionwhyitstimetolegalize.showMessage?topicID=216.topic

Marijuana Smoke VS Tobacco-
http://cannabinoid.com/wwwboard/research/messages/2/2308.shtml

Survey On The Use Of Crop Chemicals On Tobacco
http://galen.library.ucsf.edu/tobacco/1100.html

Cannabis safer than aspirin.
http://pub3.ezboard.com/fendingcannabisprohibitionwhyitstimetolegalize.showMessage?topicID=174.topic

Tobacco vs cannabis article
http://pub3.ezboard.com/fendingcannabisprohibitionwhyitstimetolegalize.showMessage?topicID=124.topic

The Hype: Cannabis more harmful than Tobacco!
http://www.ariannaonline.com/discus/messages/4/432.html?SundayDecember1919990212pm

Cancer from Cannabis Bogus
http://www.ariannaonline.com/discus/messages/4/455.html?MondayDecember2719990903pm

Tobacco vs Pot
http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v99/n742/a01.html

Tobacco Maker Tested Marijuana-Scented CigarettesÊ
http://www.cannabisnews.com/news/thread930.shtml

Marijuana vs. Cigarettes
http://lotek-home.hypermart.net/wwwboard/messages/17.html

David Hadorn Writes: Beyond A Reasonable Doubt Cannabis Is
Substantially Less Harmful Than Alcohol Or Tobacco.
http://www.marijuananews.com/david_hadorn_writes.htm

Tobacco Harm Reduction. Versus Tobacco Prohibition. Additives and
smok...
http://members.fortunecity.com/multi19/tobacco.htm

WHO did not Bow to Political Pressure on Cannabis
http://www.who.int/inf-pr-1998/en/pr98-26.html

"Tobacco A More Dangerous Drug Than Marijuana, But It's Still Legal" --
Colorado Physician
http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v98/n252/a07.html?2064

Exporting Tobacco Addiction From The Usa
http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v98/n554/a02.html?2110

Protect Children From Tobacco Addiction, Says WHO
http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v98/n422/a07.html?2110

Tobacco Company Set Up Network of Sympathetic Scientists
http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v98/n384/a10.html?2110

Tobacco firm had secret army of scientists in smoke battle
http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v98/n358/a12.html?2110

Smokers More Likely To Develop Dementia, Study Says
http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v98/n475/a09.html?2110

Tobacco Tactics: Not So Passive About Smoking After
http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v98/n360/a10.html?2117

Tobacco Firm Paid Scientists as Stooges
http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v98/n353/a09.html?2117

Tobacco Corporations Step Up Invasion Of Developing Countries
http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v98/n204/a01.html?2117

New Zealand: Marijuana Has The Health Risks Of Tobacco Say
http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v00.n1758.a05.html

Newt Gingrich vs. Tobacco Companies
http://www.fhipa.com/nyslime/gingrich.html

Media Enlist in Government Marijuana Crusade
http://www.fair.org/extra/9707/marijuana.html
Summary: As America's officially ignored death toll from overdoses of heroin, cocaine, prescription drugs and alcohol mixed with dope took another huge jump, America's media raged with the threat to the republic posed by sick people smoking marijuana to relieve pain.

Rangel's Dependence on Alcohol/Tobacco Money May Explain His
Indiffere...
http://www.prweb.com/releases/2000/prweb18553.htm

Marijuana vs. Cigarettes
http://lotek-home.hypermart.net/wwwboard/messages/20.html

The Medical Marijuana Magazine
http://www.marijuanamagazine.com/toc/toc.htm

tobacco vs marijuana
http://www.korealink.com/public/qa/messages/159.htm

Tobacco Vs Marijuana by Eric Voth MD
TOBACCO VS MARIJUANA. Our national leadership as well as the public is inflamed over recent reports of the tobacco industry increasing nicotine...
http://www.drugwatch.org/Documents/DWEV.html

TOBACCO vs MARIJUANA, Dr. Eric A .Voth
http://www.estreet.com/orgs/dsi/Editorials/TOBACCOvsMARIJUANADr.EricA.Vot

Tobacco Vs. Marijuana. Date: March 8, 1998
http://www.mir.drugtext.org/map/letters/1998/03/lte26.html

Tobacco Vs. Marijuana
http://mir.drugtext.org/map/letters/1998/03/lte26.html

Tobacco vs. Marijuana
http://www.cannabinoid.com/wwwboard/culture/messages/327.shtml

Tobacco vs. the FDA: Rule Summary and Status On August 28, 1996,
http://tobaccofreekids.org/reports/fda/summarysta...

Differencs between Marijuana and Tobacco
http://www.well.com/user/smendler/romp/top10tob.htm

Comparison of marijuana and tobacco smoke
http://nepenthes.lycaeum.org/Drugs/THC/Health/smoke.componen...

Directory of Introductions and FAQs from Free-Market.Net: The Freedom Network
http://www.free-market.net/directorybycategory/brief/
http://www.free-market.net/directorybycategory/news/

Chemicals in Tobacco
http://www.healthdept.co.pierce.wa.us/tobacco/cessation/chemical.html

One cigarette is not alone. Each cigarette from tobacco and filter to the paper it's rolled in is filled with chemicals, some added, some natural.

There are over 4000 chemicals in cigarettes. Some that you may recognize are: Acetic Acid (vinegar), Acetone (nail polish remover), Ammonia (floor/toilet cleaner), Arsenic (rat poison), Butane (cigarette lighter fluid), Cadmium (rechargeable batteries), Carbon Monoxide (car exhaust fumes), DDT/Deildrin (insecticides, Ethanol (alcohol), Formaldehyde (preservation of body, tissue and fabric), Hexamine (barbecue lighter), Hydrogen Cyanide (gas chamber poison), Methane (swamp gas), Methanol (rocket fuel), Napthalene (mothballs), Nicotine (insecticide/addictive drug), Nitrobenzene (gasoline additive), Nitrous Oxide Phenols (disinfectant), Stearic Acid (candle wax), Toluene (industrial solvent), Vinyl Chloride (makes PVC)

Cancer-causing Agents:
Benzo(a)pyrene, B-Napthylamine, Cadmium, Crysenes, Dibenz Acidine, Nickel, Nitrosamines, N. Nitrosomes, P.A.H.s, Polonium 210, Toludine, Urethane

Metals:
Aluminum, Copper, Gold, Lead, Magnesium, Mercury, Silicon, Silver, Titanium, Zinc

drugs slovents intoxicants
http://area51.upsu.plym.ac.uk/~harl/tobacco.html

Native Brand Cigarettes 100% Tobacco No Chemicals or Ignitors
http://www.angelfire.com/mi2/tobaccoparadize/cigarettes.html
Native Brand Cigarettes 100% Tobacco
No Chemicals or Ignitors Pure Satisfying Flavorful
At Wholesale Prices
Grown in the USA by Native Americans. Flavorful, satisfying, pure, 100% tobacco cigarettes, no chemicals or ignitors added to make them burn faster or extra nicotine to make you smoke more. THE HEALTHIER SMOKE IF YOU CARE ABOUT YOURSELF AND THOSE AROUND YOU AT WHOLESALE PRICES. The best tastng cigarettes that you will find in the world. $14.00 a carton
shipped. You may order-Regulars-Lights-Ultra Lights-Menthols. You may call in an order toll free to Jim Roche at 1-888-891-2853 or send a check or money order to Thunderbird International C/O Jim Roche P.O. Box 179 Hoopa CA 95546 Guaranteed the best you have ever tasted or
"JUST SEND BACK THE ASHES". You may order a pack or two just to try them out.

Survey On The Use Of Crop Chemicals On Tobacco
http://www.galen.library.ucsf.edu/tobacco/docs/html/1171.05/index.html

Nicotine fact sheet
http://www.lec.org/DrugSearch/Documents/Nicotine.html
Nicotine is a substance found in tobacco. It is found in all tobacco products such as: cigarettes, pipe tobacco, chewing tobacco, and cigars. When a person smokes a tobacco product, they inhale the smoke which contains nicotine as well as over 500 chemicals.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/related_stories.asp?filename=000509003850

Here are the first five of the 7960 related stories.
To view more matching stories, scroll down to the end of this page.

Scientists Finger A Molecular Kingpin In Body's Response To Cigarettes Using genetically modified ...

Health Risk To "Cigarette Babies" Is Neglected

Study Finds Smoking Does Not Keep Young Adults Thin

Adolescent Smokers Are More Susceptible To Long-Term DNA Damage From Smoking Than Adults Smokers

Tobacco Smoke Flavoring Contains Hazardous Chemicals
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2000/05/000509003850.htmÊ

American Chemical Society
http://www.acs.org

Tobacco Smoke Flavoring Contains Hazardous Chemicals Compounds May
Pose Additional Health Risk to Smokers

Scientists have new data that toxic flavoring chemicals found in cigarettes are reaching smokers through cigarette smoke and may pose health hazards of their own. The finding is reported in the April issue of the Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, published by the American Chemical Society, the worldÕs largest scientific society.

The flavoring chemicals, known as alkenylbenzenes, are found in tobacco additives used to enhance the taste of cigarette smoke. Until now, no one knew how much of the compounds entered cigarette smoke, according to lead author David Ashley, Ph.D., at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta.

The researchers used a new detection method to analyze the cigarette smoke of eight U.S. brands. Previously, no method existed to easily and accurately measure the flavoring compounds in a single cigarette.

Long-term health effects from inhaling alkenylbenzenes directly or by second-hand smoke are unknown in humans, though earlier research associated them with cancer and lung damage in laboratory animals.

The National Academy of Sciences deems flavorings containing alkenylbenzenes safe for human foods. The additives, when eaten by humans, are thought to be safely eliminated by the liver. Cigarette smoke, however, delivers the chemicals to the lungs, where they spread through the body before the liver can screen them.

In the study, smoke from all types of cigarette filtered, unfiltered and menthol was tested for flavoring chemicals. Brand names were not released. Varying levels of five alkenylbenzenes were found in each, according to the researchers. In previous CDC research, researchers found one or more flavoring compounds in the tobacco of 42 of the 68 U.S. cigarette brands they examined.

One of the chemicals was found at levels up to four micrograms per gram of tobacco. Higher levels were found in the smoke when ventilation holes in the cigaretteÕs filter were blocked.

In animals, exposure to the chemicals can cause cancer and lung disease. In rodents, for example, animals inhaling one flavoring compound Ñ eugenol show far more serious adverse health effects than animals eating it, according to previous research.

Editor's Note: The original news release can be found at
http://center.acs.org/applications/news//story.cfm?story=369

Note: This story has been adapted from a news release issued by American Chemical Society for journalists and other members of the public. If you wish to quote from any part of this story, please credit American Chemical Society as the original source. You may also wish to include the following link in any citation:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2000/05/000509003850.htm

The Biology Project: Chemicals & Human Health
http://www.biology.arizona.edu/chh/

Tobacco Facts
http://www.nnic.com/tatu/facts.html

Tobacco Information
http://area51.upsu.plym.ac.uk/~harl/graphical/grphtob.html

Tobacco Tax
http://www.smoke-free.ca/factsheets/tax.htm

Toxic Chemicals in Cigarettes
http://members.tripod.com/medicolegal/toxicchemicals.htm

dmt.hit.bg:Cannabis:Indica VS Sativa
http://dmt.hit.bg/thc.htm

Erowid Cannabis Vault : Info on Smoke composition
http://www.erowid.org/plants/cannabis/cannabis_info3.shtml

History of Cannabis; Marijuana law origins
http://www.jahlifeguard.com/links3658.html

From Syrup To Scourge In 46 Years
http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v99/n397/a08.html?2159

Though It Coughs Up Bucks, Big Tobacco Gets Last Yuks
http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v98/n1014/a01.html?2159

Wire: Marijuana-Like Chemical Helps Relieve Coughs - Study
http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v00/n1643/a09.html?2161

Marijuana-Like Chemical May Control Coughing
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread7522.shtml

Marijuana-Like Chemical Helps Relieve Coughs
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread7521.shtml

LUNG CLEANER AND EXPECTORANT
http://www.jackherer.com/book/ch07.html
Cannabis is the best natural expectorant to clear the human lungs of smog, dust and the phlegm associated with tobacco use. Marijuana smoke effectively dilates the airways of the lungs, the bronchi, opening them to allow more oxygen into the lungs. It is also the best natural dilator of the tiny airways of the lungs, the bronchial tubes - making cannabis the best overall bronchial dilator for 80% of the population (the remaining 20% sometimes show minor negative reactions). (See section on asthma - a disease that closes these passages in spasms - UCLA Tashkin studies, 1969-97; U.S. Costa Rican, 1980-82; Jamaican studies 1969-74, 76.) Statistical evidence - showing up consistently as anomalies in matched populations - indicates that people who smoke tobacco cigarettes are usually better off and will live longer if they smoke cannabis moderately, too. (Jamaicna, Costa Rican studies.) Millions of Americans have given up or avoided smoking tobacco products in favor of cannabis, which is not good news to the powerful tobacco
lobby - Senator Jesse Helms and his cohorts. A turn-of-the-century grandfather clause in U.S. tobacco law allows 400 to 6,000 additional chemicals to be added. Additions since then to the average tobacco cigarette are unknown, and the public in the U.S. has no right to know what they are. Many joggers and marathon runners feel cannabis use cleans their lungs, allowing better endurance. The evidence indicates that cannabis use will probably increase these outlaw American
marijuana-users' lives by about one to two years - yet they may lose their rights, property, children, state licenses, etc., just for using that safest of substances: cannabis.

Cannabis and Asthma
http://www.jackherer.com/book/ch07.html

More than 15 million Americans are affected by asthma. Smoking cannabis (the "raw drug" as the AMA called it) would be beneficial for 80% of them and add 30-a60 million person-years in the aggregate of extended life to current asthmatics over presently legal toxic medicines such as
the Theophylline prescribed to children. "Taking a hit of marijuana has been known to stop a full blown asthma attack." (Personal communication with Dr. Donald Tashkin, December 12, 1989 and December 1, 1997.) The use of cannabis for asthmatics goes back thousands of years in literature. American doctors of the last century wrote glowing reports in medical papers that asthma sufferers of the world would "bless" Indian hemp (cannabis) all their lives. Today, of the 16 million American asthma sufferers, only Californians, with a doctor's recommendation, can legally grow and use cannabis medicines, even though it is generally the most effective treatment for asthma.

(Tashkin, Dr. Donald, UCLA Pulmonary Studies (for smoked marijuana), 1969-97; Ibid., asthma studies, 1969-76; Cohen, Sidney & Stillman, Therapeutic Potential of Marijuana, 1976; Life Insurance Actuarial rates; Life shortening effects of childhood asthma, 1983.)

THERAPEUTIC EMPHYSEMA POTENTIAL

Cannabis Treatment of Asthma
http://www.rxmarihuana.com/lisa.htm

Marijuana and Asthma
http://www.ariannaonline.com/discus/messages/4/448.html?WednesdayDecember2219990107am

Marijuana Research Could Help Asthma Sufferers, Scientists Say
http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v00/n1646/a09.html?2161

Health Aspects of Cannabis -Bronchial Asthma
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/hemp/medical/hollis1.htm

Effects of Smoked Marijuana in Experimentally Induced Asthma
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/hemp/medical/tashkin/tashkin1.htm

Study: Pollutants Can Trigger Heart Attack
http://www.cannabisnews.com/news/thread10032.shtml

=====
Safe Sacramental Cannabis Food Fuel Fiber FARM-aceuticals
Hardrug&Booze Alternative Eliminated from the Free Market
by Legislation and Administrated Education Depravation!
http://server5.ezboard.com/bendingcannabisprohibition.html
http://pub3.ezboard.com/bendingcannabisprohibition
Cybrary (links above)Why do you think they call it dope?
http://www.cannabis.com/ezine/just_say_know/2.shtml


Click Here to View 4378.jpg
View 4378.jpg



Daily Herald tobacco v cannabis/College Use
DdC

Registered on
Feb-20-2000
More User Info

Message #4379 posted by DdC (Info) June 01, 2003 03:27:46 ET
In Reply to: US cigarettes v organic cannabis/tobacco posted by DdC (Info) June 01, 2003 03:17:09 ET

Tobacco Vs. Marijuana

Date: March 8, 1998
Source: Daily Herald (Arlington Heights, IL)
Author: Stephen Young

Daily Herald editorial writers articulated our national schizophrenia regarding drug policy recently as they rallied for universal condemnation of marijuana ("Marijuana use isn't harmless," Feb. 17) while days later they favored concessions and continued leniency for the tobacco industry ("Without immunity, tobacco deal fails," Feb. 19). These views may be popular, but when analyzed side by side they defy logic.

Tobacco addicts millions and it leads hundreds of thousands to early death each year, including second-hand smokers who didn't even make the choice to use it. No one suggests tobacco has
medical value.

Marijuana, on the other hand, has been recommended by doctors to patients suffering from AIDS, the side effects of chemotherapy and a variety of spastic muscle disorders, among other maladies. It is not physically addicting and human deaths related to marijuana use have not been credibly documented.

There is no argument about the need to keep children away from both substances, but the strategies are radically different. Somehow marijuana will be kept away from kids by exaggerating its risks and enforcing increasingly strict penalties for any use, even doctor-sanctioned medical use. But when it comes to tobacco, the industry should be trusted to keep kids away from their product, even though documents now show how representatives lied for decades about active marketing to children.

Both strategies retreat from honesty and rationality as if they were the plague. They have failed and will continue to fail.

To show how ludicrous these "solutions" are, think about reversing them. Imagine a world where marijuana manufacturers are allowed the power to negotiate regulation even as they receive subsidies from the federal government, while pot is available at virtually every gas station and grocery store. In that same world, imagine citizens who risk forfeiting their liberty and property for possessing the smallest amount of tobacco, while they are scolded by editorialists for not thinking negatively enough about the demon drug.

Sound insane? Perhaps, but how much crazier is it than what we have now?
Stephen Young
Roselle, IL

Name: Chris
Email: maxthedog1@aol.com
Home Page:
Subject: tobacco vs marijuana
Date: 10/13/96
------------------------------------------------------------------------
In Reply to: Help!! No legalizing Marijuana, please!!! posted by erectus
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Concern, I believe is a wonderful thing.
Reality is even better.
The reality is that the drugs that are legal in this country:
Tobacco, caffeine, and alcohol are much more dangerous than marijuana has ever been.
An other problem is the way illegal drugs are all lumpped together into one category.
Marijuana is much less of a real danger than all other drugs,
legal or otherwise (excepting maybe caffeine).
Please stop and think for a while.
Are your fears reasonable or have you simply inherited them?

****************************************************
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 8 AUGUST 2000 AT 14:00 ET US

Contact: Jacki Flowers
jflowers@partners.org
617-724-2753
Massachusetts General Hospital

Nearly half of college students used tobacco in one-year period, according to JAMA study

The first national study to report on both cigarette and non-cigarette tobacco use by college students finds that nearly one-half of college students (46 percent) reported using tobacco
products in the previous year. The study is reported in the Aug. 9 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association and was conducted by researchers from the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and the Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH) College Alcohol Study. By including the use of cigars and smokeless tobacco, the study finds a greater prevalence of tobacco use among college students than have previous reports that looked only at cigarette use.

The study, conducted under a grant from The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, is based on responses from a nationally representative sample of 14,138 college students surveyed in 1999. It involves students at 119 colleges in 39 states. The study survey asked students whether they had smoked a cigarette, cigar, pipe, or used smokeless tobacco in the past 30 days or in the past 12 months. "Current use" was considered as use in the past 30 days, and one third of college students were current tobacco users. The study was released at a JAMA media briefing held in conjunction with the World Conference on Tobacco or Health in Chicago.

"Our findings show that college students are using all types of tobacco products. Essentially, college students are playing with fire, putting themselves at risk of a lifelong addiction to nicotine," said lead author Nancy Rigotti, MD, director of Tobacco Research and Treatment at Massachusetts General Hospital and associate professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School. "All tobacco products - not just cigarettes - can produce nicotine addiction. Young people who are smoking cigars may not think that they are at risk of getting hooked, but they are. Repeated
exposure to any tobacco product puts students at increased danger of becoming addicted to nicotine."

Although about 28 percent of both male and female students were current cigarette smokers, total tobacco use was much higher among males (38 percent versus 30 percent). The study shows that the difference is almost entirely due to males' much higher use of cigars. Over one-third of college students have ever smoked a cigar, including more than half of males and one quarter of females. Nine percent had smoked a cigar in the past month.

"Because of male cigar consumption, overall tobacco use rates are higher in male students than in females despite identical rates of cigarette smoking," Rigotti said.

The study finds that more than half (51 percent) of college tobacco users used more than one type of tobacco product in the past year. Cigars and cigarettes were the most frequent combination. The study shows that cigar smoking accounts for the largest share of non-cigarette tobacco use and is most popular among freshmen and sophomores and among male students with a strong interest in fraternities, parties and attending sporting events. Less common are smokeless tobacco and pipes (used by 3.7 and 1.2 percent of students respectively), but students also use these in combination with other tobacco products.

Prior to the early 1990s, cigar smoking in the United States was primarily a behavior of older men. Few young adults and few women smoked cigars. But this pattern has changed dramatically, says the study. Cigar use is now common among college students. The authors note that, after cigar manufacturers stepped up their promotional activities in the early 1990s, cigar consumption increased by 50 percent between 1993 and 1998, reversing a 30-year decline. The
authors cite studies in California reporting that cigar use is increasing most rapidly among young adults and is more common among individuals with more education and higher incomes.

"We've left college students exposed to the most addictive drug on the planet by focusing our concern only on those under 18," said Henry Wechsler, PhD, director of the HSPH College Alcohol Study. "We don't do that with alcohol, and we shouldn't do it with tobacco."

The study also found that tobacco use was significantly higher among whites, users of other substances, such as alcohol and marijuana, and among students whose priorities were social rather than educational or athletic. "Use of tobacco products goes along with a generally riskier lifestyle and a strong party orientation," Rigotti said.

On the positive side, most cigar use is occasional, with 90 percent of students who smoke cigars doing so on less than five days in the previous month. In addition, cigarette use for the previous 12 months stabilized in 1999 at 38 percent, after having increased by 28 percent between 1993 and 1997.

According to the study, the college years are a crucial time in the development or abandonment of smoking behavior. Therefore, colleges offer an important opportunity to discourage tobacco use. As a key component to discouraging cigarette and cigar use, the authors recommend making all college buildings, including dormitories and living quarters, smoke-free. "This would protect
nonsmokers from second-hand smoke and reduce the visibility of smoking on campus," said Rigotti. "Smoke-free dormitories may discourage new students from taking up smoking, make it easier for current smokers to stop and even reduce fire hazards."

"Curbing tobacco use of all types should be a national priority," Rigotti added. "Tobacco use is rising among young Americans. If this trend continues, it threatens to reverse the decline in U.S.
adult smoking that we have witnessed over the past half century."

###

In addition to Rigotti and Wechsler, Jae Eun Lee, DrPH, of the department of Health and Social Behavior at HSPH was a co-author of the study.

For more information on the Harvard School of Public Health College Alcohol Study, please visit the website at:
http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/cas.

HSPH contact: Bob Brustman, 617-432-3952
brustman@hsph.harvard.edu
------------------
Back to EurekAlert!
****************************************************
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 8 AUGUST 2000

Contact: Jacki Flowers
617-724-2753
Center for the Advancement of Health

Tobacco use common among college students

Cigarette use most common; cigar use also substantial

CHICAGO -- Nearly half of college students surveyed report using tobacco products within the past year, according to an article in the August 9 issue of The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), a theme issue on tobacco.

Nancy A. Rigotti, MD, director of Tobacco Research and Treatment at Massachusetts General Hospital and associate professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School in Boston, and colleagues examined data from surveys submitted by randomly selected students from 119 four-year colleges in the United States in 1999. The data were from the Harvard School of Public Health College Alcohol Survey, which was designed to assess alcohol and other substance use -- including tobacco use. The survey also includes questions about demographic and background characteristics, satisfaction with education and students' interests and lifestyle choices. Of the students randomly selected, 60 percent (14,138 students) responded.

Dr. Rigotti presented the study here today at a JAMA media briefing on tobacco during the World Conference on Tobacco OR Health.

More than half (61.0 percent) of those who responded to the survey have tried a tobacco product, nearly half (45.7) percent reported using tobacco products in the past year and one-third (32.9) percent reported using tobacco products within the past 30 days. Concerning cigarette use, 38.1 percent reported smoking in the past year and 28.5 percent reported smoking within the past 30 days. Among the students who reported being current smokers (having smoked within the past 30 days), 32.0 percent reported smoking less than one cigarette per day, 43.6 percent reported smoking one to ten cigarettes per day and 12.8 percent reported smoking one or more packs of cigarettes per day.

After cigarettes, cigars were the most commonly used tobacco products by the survey respondents. More than one third (37.1 percent) reported having ever smoked a cigar, 23.0 percent reported smoking a cigar within the past year and 8.5 percent reported smoking a cigar within the past 30 days. According to the authors, this is the first national study to report on cigar use among college students. The high rate of cigar smoking by college students is consistent with other data that show a 50 percent increase in cigar consumption in the U.S. between 1993 and 1998, following a 30-year decline. The authors note that until the 1990s, cigar use was rare in young adults and women, but this is no longer the case.

"This study contains several new findings," the researchers write. "It demonstrates that tobacco use among college students is more prevalent than previously appreciated, because tobacco use is not limited to cigarettes. Cigar smoking is substantial, and smokeless tobacco (and, rarely, pipes) are also used. Most tobacco users use more than one tobacco product, with cigars and cigarettes being the most common combination. ... This study also reports some good news. Cigarette use by college students, which increased dramatically between 1993 and 1997, stabilized between 1997 and 1999."

Of the respondents, men reported using tobacco more than women. More than half of the men (53.0 percent) reported having used tobacco in the past year compared with 41.3 percent of women; 37.9 percent of men and 29.7 percent of women reported using tobacco within the past 30 days. "The sex difference in total tobacco use is entirely attributable to a higher prevalence of non-cigarette tobacco use [greater use of cigars, smokeless tobacco products and pipes] among men, because men and women have nearly identical cigarette smoking rates," the authors write.

The researchers found that tobacco use was associated with certain demographic and background characteristics, levels of satisfaction with education and students' interests and lifestyle choices. "Male and white students are more likely to use tobacco than female and non-white students [students that are Hispanic, Asian or black]," according to the authors. "Students who use tobacco are also more likely to smoke marijuana, binge drink, have more sexual partners, have lower grades, rate parties as important and spend more time socializing with friends. Tobacco users are less likely than nonusers to rate athletics or religion as important and to be satisfied with their education."

"College appears to be a time when many students are trying a range of tobacco products and are in danger of developing lifelong nicotine dependence," the authors write. "National efforts to monitor and reduce tobacco use of all types should expand to focus on college students and other young adults."

One solution recommended by the authors is to make all college buildings, including dormitories, smoke-free. Not only would this protect nonsmoking students from the second-hand smoke exposure, but it would also reduce the visibility of smoking on college campuses. They suggest that this might discourage students from starting to smoke, help those who do smoke to stop, and even reduce the hazard of fires in dorms.

Citing other sources, the authors note that: "Tobacco use is increasing among young Americans. Cigarette smoking rates among adolescents increased by 32 percent between 1991 and 1997. Cigarette smoking by young adults (18-24 years) increased by 16 percent between 1995 and 1997. ... If this trend continues, it threatens to reverse the decline in smoking prevalence among U.S. adults that has occurred during the past half century."

###

(JAMA. 2000; 284: 699-705)

Editor's Note: This study was supported by a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Dr. Rigotti currently receives grant support from Glaxo Wellcome Inc. In the past, she received support from SmithKline Beecham Consumer Healthcare and received honoraria for lectures from McNeil, Glaxo Wellcome and SmithKline Beecham.

Media Advisory: To contact Nancy A. Rigotti, MD, call Jacki Flowers at 617-724-2753. On Tuesday, August 8, call the Science News Department at 312-464-5374.

For more information about The Journal of the American Medical Association or to obtain a copy of the study, please contact the American Medical Association's Brian Pace at 312-464-4311 or
E-mail Brian_Pace@ama-assn.org.

Posted by the Center for the Advancement of Health
http://www.cfah.org. For information about the Center, call
Petrina Chong, pchong@cfah.org 202-387-2829.
-----------------
Back to EurekAlert!
****************************************************
Did you know that every time you take a puff out of a cigarette, you put
4,700 different chemicals into your body? Well, now you do!
Let me list some of them for you:

* ammonia (a poisonous gas and a powerful
* toilet cleaner-uggh! How would it feel like to have something in common with a toilet?)
* arsenic (a potent poison), cyanide (a deadly ingredient in rat poison)
* acetone ( a poisonous solvent)
* polonium-210 (a highly radioactive element)
* carbon monoxide (a poisonous gas.)

Some of you might think "It'll only kill me if there are high contents" but once you smoke, the chemicals do not leave your body and each time you pick up that cigarette, the chemicals will build up and become very dangerous to your health. Lung cancer, throat cancer, heart disease, strokes and emphysema are just some of the painful, life threatening diseases linked with smoking. Smoking is also associated with cancer of the mouth, pharynx, esophagus, pancreas, cervix, kidney and bladder.

Here's another fact.

Each year, smoking kills more than 400,000 Americans-that's more than alcohol, cocaine, crack, heroin, homicide, suicide, car accidents, fires and AIDS combined!
Do you want to be added on to that list?

You say "Hey, those movie stars and models look cool in the ads when they're smoking, they look healthy and sexy, and even athletes smoke and they must be healthy."
Give me a break!

That's the image tobacco manufacturers promote so you can buy their products. Don't let yourself fall into that trap because all they want is your money. How cool can it be speeding up the process of your death! Let me tell you how it really looks. Your skin will wrinkle faster, your teeth will turn yellow and yucky like you haven/t brushed it for a year, your nails will also turn yellow, your breath will stink, your clothes will stink, your hair will stink, you will stink!

"I know a lot of old people who smoked since they were teens and they're still alive and smoking." They're still alive, but are they healthy? I don't think so.

For parents, did you know..?

* Each day, more than 3,000 young people begin to smoke---or more than one million each year. The majority of the new smokers who replace the old smokers who quit or died prematurely from smoking related diseases are children and teens.

* About half of adolescent smokers have parents who smoke. Teenagers are three times more likely to smoke if their parents do and if at least one older sibling smoke.

About 85% of adolescent smokers who buy their own cigarettes usually buy Marlboro, Newport, or Camel cigarettes, the most heavily marketed brands.

* Most people begin smoking during childhood or adolescence. The average age people first try smoking is 14.5 years, and 88% of persons who have ever tried a cigarette have done so by age 18. 71% of those adults who currently smoke every day started by the age of 18.

Do you want your kids to smoke? Of course not! If you don't want your daughter, your son, your babies to smoke, then maybe you shouldn't.

More Facts?

WE ARE THE TEENS AGAINST TOBACCO USE (TATU).

Smoking Facts
About TATU
Children's Story
WE ARE TOO SMART TO START AND TOO COOL TO SMOKE!


Click Here to View 4379.jpg
View 4379.jpg



The Guardian cannabis v tobacco/Costa Rica
DdC

Registered on
Feb-20-2000
More User Info

Message #4380 posted by DdC (Info) June 01, 2003 03:39:10 ET
In Reply to: Daily Herald tobacco v cannabis/College Use posted by DdC (Info) June 01, 2003 03:27:46 ET

Protective Effects of Marijuana Smoke VS Tobacco
http://cannabinoid.com/wwwboard/research/messages/2/2308.shtml



Tobacco radioactive, cannabis safer...
http://pub3.ezboard.com/fendingcannabisprohibitionwhyitstimetolegalize.showMessage?topicID=216.topic

Cannabis safer than aspirin.(Which kills 1100 a year)
http://pub3.ezboard.com/fendingcannabisprohibitionwhyitstimetolegalize.showMessage?topicID=174.topic

Tobacco vs cannabis article
http://pub3.ezboard.com/fendingcannabisprohibitionwhyitstimetolegalize.showMessage?topicID=124.topic

Drug Deaths Per Year


Canada: PUB LTE: Tobacco vs Pot
http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v99/n742 /a01.html

Some Marijuana History 
http://www.cannabisnews.com/news/thread7829.shtml
Summary: Some Marijuana History Posted by FoM on November 30, 2000 at 16:32:41 PT Letter To The Editor by Ray Titus Sanborn Source: Ukiah Daily Journal The only similarities between tobacco and marijuana is they both burn and taxes.

Tobacco Maker Tested Marijuana-Scented Cigarettes 
http://www.cannabisnews.com/news/thread930.shtml

Carl T. Rowan: Ban tobacco like marijuana and cocaine 
URL: http://www.chron.com/content/chronicle/editorial/98/04/11/ro...
Summary: By CARL T. ROWAN THE local drug pusher cornered the president of the United States at a fund-raiser and said: "Cocaine has been good. We paid for our mansion off cocaine.

drugabuse.com: -Protective Effects of Marijuana Smoke VS Tobacco-
http://www.drugabuse.com/boards/treatment/messages/0/389.shtml

Go Ask Alice!: Marijuana and health 
URL: http://www.goaskalice.columbia.edu/0791.html

Amazing Facts About Tobacco Did you know......

Over 615 billion cigarettes are consumed in the U.S. each year.
It is estimated that 54 million Americans smoke.
7 million young people between the ages of 12 to 20 smoke.
12,000 different toxic chemicals have been identified in cigarettes.
2-pack-a-day smokers lose 65% more workdays than nonsmokers.
Every year 30,000 people 65 and under die of lung cancer, 10,000 of emphysema, and 1,000,000 people have lung problems.
People who smoke are twice as likely to have heart attacks as non-smoker.
Smoking mothers have twice as many stillbirths and spontaneous abortions and 2-3 times as many premature babies as nonsmoking mothers.
The tobacco industry spends $40 million each year to launch new cigarettes.
The $1.8 billion spent on tobacco advertising each year is 25 times the amount we spend each year on research into lung disease and twice what is spent on research for prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancer.

Marijuana vs. Cigarettes
http://lotek-home.hypermart.net/wwwboard/messages/17.html

MarijuanaNews.Com, Freedom has nothing to fear from the truth 
http://www.marijuananews.com/tobacco_a_more_dangerous_drug_t...
Summary: Daily Magazine MarijuanaNews.Com with Richard Cowan Mail Center "Tobacco A More Dangerous Drug Than Marijuana, But It’s Still Legal" -- Colorado Physician

MarijuanaNews.Com, Marijuana Safer Than Alcohol
URL: http://www.marijuananews.com/lancet_says_marijuana_safer_tha...

MarijuanaNews.Com, Freedom has nothing to fear from the truth 
URL: http://www.marijuananews.com/marijuana_may_be_shown_to_be_mo...

ASTHMA

More than 15 million Americans are affected by asthma. Smoking cannabis (the "raw drug" as the AMA called it) would be beneficial for 80% of them and add 30-a60 million person-years in the aggregate of extended life to current asthmatics over presently legal toxic medicines such as the Theophylline prescribed to children.

"Taking a hit of marijuana has been known to stop a full blown asthma attack." (Personal communication with Dr. Donald Tashkin, December 12, 1989 and December 1, 1997.) The use of cannabis for asthmatics goes back thousands of years in literature. American doctors of the last century wrote glowing reports in medical papers that asthma sufferers of the world would "bless" Indian hemp (cannabis) all their lives.

Today, of the 16 million American asthma sufferers, only Californians, with a doctor's recommendation, can legally grow and use cannabis medicines, even though it is generally the most effective treatment for asthma.

(Tashkin, Dr. Donald, UCLA Pulmonary Studies (for smoked marijuana), 1969-97; Ibid., asthma studies, 1969-76; Cohen, Sidney & Stillman, Therapeutic Potential of Marijuana, 1976; Life Insurance Actuarial rates; Life shortening effects of childhood asthma, 1983.)
http://www.jackherer.com/textonly/newpage7.htm



Newt Gingrich vs. Tobacco Companies     
http://www.fhipa.com/nyslime/gingrich.html

Pot Boiler: Media Enlist in Government Marijuana Crusade 
http://www.fair.org/extra/9707/marijuana.html
Summary: As America's officially ignored death toll from overdoses of heroin, cocaine, prescription drugs and alcohol mixed with dope took another huge jump, America's media raged with the threat to the republic posed by sick people smoking marijuana to relieve pain.

Rangel's Dependence on Alcohol/Tobacco Money May Explain His Indiffere... 
URL: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2000/prweb18553.htm
Summary: The Manhattan Libertarian Party today accused U.S. Congressman Charles Rangel of playing favorites with certain recreational drugs by accepting thousands of dollars in campaign contributions from the alcohol and tobacco lobbies, while ignoring pleas from his own constituents for sensible reform of marijuana laws.Charlie Rangel's cozy relationship with the alcohol and tobacco lobbies sends a...



80% Re: Marijuana vs. Cigarettes
http://lotek-home.hypermart.net/wwwboard/messages/20.html

83% The Medical Marijuana Magazine
http://www.marijuanamagazine.com/toc/toc.htm

93% tobacco vs marijuana
http://www.korealink.com/public/qa/messages/159.htm

Tobacco Vs. Marijuana. Date: March 8, 1998
URL: http://mir.drugtext.org/map/letters/1998/03/lte26.html

Tobacco vs. the FDA: Rule Summary and Status
http://tobaccofreekids.org/reports/fda

Top 10 Differencs between Marijuana and Tobacco 
http://www.well.com/user/smendler/romp/top10tob.htm

Comparison of marijuana and tobacco smoke 
http://nepenthes.lycaeum.org/Drugs/THC/Health/smoke.components.html
http://nepenthes.lycaeum.org/Drugs/THC/Health/

Chemicals in Tobacco
http://www.healthdept.co.pierce.wa.us/tobacco/cessation/chemical.html

One cigarette is not alone. Each cigarette from tobacco and filter to the paper it's rolled in is filled with chemicals, some added, some natural.
There are over 4000 chemicals in cigarettes. Some that you may recognize are:

Acetic Acid (vinegar), Acetone (nail polish remover), Ammonia (floor/toilet cleaner), Arsenic (rat poison), Butane (cigarette lighter fluid), Cadmium (rechargeable batteries), Carbon Monoxide (car exhaust fumes), DDT/Deildrin (insecticides, Ethanol (alcohol), Formaldehyde (preservation of body, tissue and fabric), Hexamine (barbecue lighter), Hydrogen Cyanide (gas chamber poison), Methane (swamp gas), Methanol (rocket fuel), Napthalene (mothballs) Nicotine (insecticide/addictive drug), Nitrobenzene (gasoline additive), Nitrous Oxide Phenols (disinfectant), Stearic Acid (candle wax), Toluene (industrial solvent), Vinyl Chloride (makes PVC)

Cancer-causing Agents:
Benzo(a)pyrene, B-Napthylamine, Cadmium, Crysenes, Dibenz Acidine, Nicke, Nitrosamines, N. Nitrosomes, P.A.H.s, Polonium 210, Toludine, Urethane

Metals:
Aluminum, Copper, Gold, Lead, Magnesium, Mercury, Silicon, Silver, Titanium, Zinc

drugs slovents intoxicants
http://area51.upsu.plym.ac.uk/~harl/index.html
tobacco
http://area51.upsu.plym.ac.uk/~harl/tobacco.html
cannabis
http://area51.upsu.plym.ac.uk/~harl/cannabis.html

Native Brand Cigarettes 100% Tobacco No Chemicals or Ignitors Pure Satisfying Flavorful At Wholesale Prices
URL: http://www.angelfire.com/mi2/tobaccoparadize/cigarettes.html

Grown in the USA by Native Americans. Flavorful, satisfying, pure, 100% tobacco cigarettes, no chemicals or ignitors added to make them burn faster or extra nicotine to make you smoke more.
You may call in an order toll free to Jim
Roche at
1-888-891-2853 or send a check or money order to Thunderbird International
C/O Jim Roche
P.O. Box 179
Hoopa CA 95546
Guaranteed the best you have ever tasted or
"JUST SEND BACK THE ASHES".
You may order a pack or two just to try them out.

Survey On The Use Of Crop Chemicals On Tobacco
Notes: Report Author(s): Drummond, J. Year: 1972 Date: October 16, Document ID:1171.05 Doc ID 1171.05 contains 5 pages of document 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5...
http://galen.library.ucsf.edu/tobacco/docs/html/1171.05/index.html
Document Index
http://galen.library.ucsf.edu/tobacco/1100.html

Nicotine fact sheet 
http://www.lec.org/DrugSearch/Documents/Nicotine.html
Summary: Nicotine is a substance found in tobacco. It is found in all tobacco products such as: cigarettes, pipe tobacco, chewing tobacco, and cigars. When a person smokes a tobacco product, they inhale the smoke which contains nicotine as well as over 500 chemicals.
ScienceDaily Magazine Related Stories
http://www.sciencedaily.com/related_stories.asp?filename=000509003850

Here are the first five of the 7960 related stories. To view more matching stories, scroll down to the end of this page.

Scientists Finger A Molecular Kingpin In Body's Response To Cigarettes Using genetically modified ...

Tobacco Smoke Flavoring Contains Hazardous Chemicals Scientists have new data that toxic flavoring chemicals found in cigarettes are reaching smokers through cigarette smoke and may pose health hazards of their own. The finding is reported in the April issue of the Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry...

Health Risk To "Cigarette Babies" Is Neglected, Duke Scientist Charges The medical community, government and media have neglected unequivocal scientific evidence that nicotine from maternal smoking causes possibly 100,000 fetal deaths each year as well as massive numbers of crib deaths, according to a Duke University Medical...

Study Finds Smoking Does Not Keep Young Adults Thin While the tobacco industry has named cigarettes ...

Adolescent Smokers Are More Susceptible To Long-Term DNA Damage From Smoking Than Adults Smokers Adolescent smokers appear to be more susceptible to long-term DNA damage associated with lung cancer than people who start smoking as adults, according to a study led by a UC San Francisco researcher that examined DNA damage in former smokers who have...

Tobacco Smoke Flavoring Contains Hazardous Chemicals
URL: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2000/05/000509003850.htm 
Source: American Chemical Society (http://www.acs.org)
Date:Posted 5/9/2000
Tobacco Smoke Flavoring Contains Hazardous Chemicals
Compounds May Pose Additional Health Risk to Smokers
Editor's Note: The original news release can be found at
http://center.acs.org/applications/news//story.cfm?story=369

The Biology Project: Chemicals & Human Health  
URL: http://www.biology.arizona.edu/chh/

The Chemical Manipulation of Human Consciousness
http://www.trufax.org/menu/chem.html

Combination of two widely used pesticides linked to Parkinson's disease
Contact: Tom Rickey trickey@admin.rochester.edu 716-275-7954
University of Rochester Combination of two widely used pesticides linked to Parkinson's disease Scientists ...
http://www.eurekalert.org/releases/uor-cot010301.html
size 8.4K

CIGAR AND PIPE SMOKING ARE AS DANGEROUS AS CIGARETTES TO PERIODONTAL HEALTH
Contact: Amy Duff amyd@perio.org 312-573-3246
American Academy of Periodontology
Cigar and pipe smoking are as dangerous as cigarettes to periodontal health CHICAGO ...
http://www.eurekalert.org/releases/aap-cap010201.html
size 3.8K

Tobacco Facts 
URL: http://www.nnic.com/tatu/facts.html
Summary: Did you know that every time you take a puff out of a cigarette, you put 4,700 different chemicals into your body? Well, now you do! Let me list some of them for you:

Tobacco Information 
URL: http://area51.upsu.plym.ac.uk/~harl/graphical/grphtob.html
Summary: The Law General Info Tobacco is the dried leaves of a plant that grows in may parts of the world. Tobacco contains a variety of chemicals, including nicotine which is a drug with a mild stimulant effect.

Tobacco Tax 
URL: http://www.smoke-free.ca/factsheets/tax.htm
Summary: Economic Costs Industry statistics Tar & Nicotine Who Smokes Quantity Smoked Brands & types Provincial Data Chemicals in Smoke Restrictions on smoking

Toxic Chemicals in Cigarettes 
URL: http://members.tripod.com/medicolegal/toxicchemicals.htm
Summary: This site lists chemicals in tobacco and tobacco smoke, legal maximums for tbose chemicals, and references.

Why do you think they call it DOPE?
http://www.cannabis.com/ezine/just_say_know/2.shtml
www.cannabinoid.com/wwwboard/politics/binaries/29/29540.gif

And tobacco pleasure?


Scientists have new data that toxic flavoring chemicals found in cigarettes are reaching smokers through cigarette smoke and may pose health hazards of their own. The finding is reported in the April issue of the Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, published by the American Chemical Society, the world’s largest scientific society.
The flavoring chemicals, known as alkenylbenzenes, are found in tobacco additives used to enhance the taste of cigarette smoke. Until now, no one knew how much of the compounds entered cigarette smoke, according to lead author David Ashley, Ph.D., at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta.

The researchers used a new detection method to analyze the cigarette smoke of eight U.S. brands. Previously, no method existed to easily and accurately measure the flavoring compounds in a single cigarette.
Long-term health effects from inhaling alkenylbenzenes directly or by second-hand smoke are unknown in humans, though earlier research associated them with cancer and lung damage in laboratory animals.

The National Academy of Sciences deems flavorings containing alkenylbenzenes safe for human foods. The additives, when eaten by humans, are thought to be safely eliminated by the liver. Cigarette smoke, however, delivers the chemicals to the lungs, where they spread through the body before the liver can screen them.
In the study, smoke from all types of cigarette — filtered, unfiltered and menthol — was tested for flavoring chemicals. Brand names were not released. Varying levels of five alkenylbenzenes were found in each, according to the researchers. In previous CDC research, researchers found one or more flavoring compounds in the tobacco of 42 of the 68 U.S. cigarette brands they examined.

One of the chemicals was found at levels up to four micrograms per gram of tobacco. Higher levels were found in the smoke when ventilation holes in the cigarette’s filter were blocked.
In animals, exposure to the chemicals can cause cancer and lung disease. In rodents, for example, animals inhaling one flavoring compound — eugenol — show far more serious adverse health effects than animals eating it, according to previous research.

Editor's Note: The original news release can be found at
http://center.acs.org/applications/news//story.cfm?story=369

Note: This story has been adapted from a news release issued by American Chemical Society for journalists and other members of the public. If you wish to quote from any part of this story, please credit American Chemical Society as the original source. You may also wish to include the following link in any citation:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2000/05/000509003850.htm

The Biology Project: Chemicals & Human Health  
URL: http://www.biology.arizona.edu/chh/
Summary: Chemicals and Humand Health contains problem sets, tutorials and activities on Kidneys and Metals, Toxicology, Lung Toxicology, Environmenta Tobacco Smoke and Lung Development and WWW Resources. The Biology Project, an interactive online resource for learning biology developed at The University of Arizona. The Biology Project...

1. Tobacco chemical protects against Parkinson's disease Contact: Charmayne Marsch y_marsh@acs.org 202-872-4445 American Chemical Society Tobacco chemical protects against Parkinson's disease Phenomenon long known, never before explained ...
http://www.eurekalert.org/

Combination of two widely used pesticides linked to Parkinson's disease
Contact: Tom Rickey trickey@admin.rochester.edu 716-275-7954
University of Rochester Combination of two widely used pesticides linked to Parkinson's disease Scientists ...
http://www.eurekalert.org/releases/uor-cot010301.html
size 8.4K

CIGAR AND PIPE SMOKING ARE AS DANGEROUS AS CIGARETTES TO PERIODONTAL HEALTH
Contact: Amy Duff amyd@perio.org 312-573-3246
American Academy of Periodontology
Cigar and pipe smoking are as dangerous as cigarettes to periodontal health CHICAGO ...
http://www.eurekalert.org/releases/aap-cap010201.html
size 3.8K

Tobacco Facts 
URL: http://www.nnic.com/tatu/facts.html
Summary: Did you know that every time you take a puff out of a cigarette, you put 4,700 different chemicals into your body? Well, now you do! Let me list some of them for you:

Tobacco Information 
URL: http://area51.upsu.plym.ac.uk/~harl/graphical/grphtob.html
Summary: The Law General Info Tobacco is the dried leaves of a plant that grows in may parts of the world. Tobacco contains a variety of chemicals, including nicotine which is a drug with a mild stimulant effect.

Tobacco Tax 
URL: http://www.smoke-free.ca/factsheets/tax.htm
Summary: Economic Costs Industry statistics Tar & Nicotine Who Smokes Quantity Smoked Brands & types Provincial Data Chemicals in Smoke Restrictions on smoking

Toxic Chemicals in Cigarettes 
URL: http://members.tripod.com/medicolegal/toxicchemicals.htm
Summary: This site lists chemicals in tobacco and tobacco smoke, legal maximums for tbose chemicals, and references.


Click Here to View 4380.jpg
View 4380.jpg



Hidden Weapons o Radioactive Mass Destruction
DdC

Registered on
Feb-20-2000
More User Info

Message #4381 posted by DdC (Info) June 01, 2003 03:45:59 ET
In Reply to: The Guardian cannabis v tobacco/Costa Rica posted by DdC (Info) June 01, 2003 03:39:10 ET

Hidden Weapons o Mass Destruction!450,000 US DEAD!
http://pub3.ezboard.com/fendingcannabisprohibitionstuff.showMessage?topicID=151.topic

Grade A fine tobacco with 650+ added chemicals never mentioned and most likely to be the "terrorist" attacking these victims and the families of the 450,000 Americans collaterally damaged in this war to maintain wealth in a few International korpses and banks! Don't Jerk that flag for the victims are not worthy, its was mass suicide! Every year maintaining profits to 450,000 doctors Pharm aids and contraptions elixers and the transportation to move it. The truckers taking speed to get them there on time. Movie Queens popping a few diet pills the same as college kids cramming test to get that job that is the best, selling chemicals to add into cigarettes. After decades of lawyer subsidies the "terrorist" companies stood before the Sergeon Soldier and Congresses mighty warriors! Nicotine! Not a word was inferred about these additional premeditated weapons "terrorist" camophlaged from the package in the cigarettes. Still used to compare the harm of smoking cannabis that hasn't any of these lab made chemical weapons attacking innocent Americans. Another barage of lawyers to remove the "pro-terrorist"cartoons actually advertizing on American airwaves and billboards to promote children into becoming victims. Same warriors sponsoring the "terrorist" sponsor the war on other "terrorist" The arab hording oil that is also as harmful as the tobacco chemicals. Argue it amoung yuourselves I need no convincing and care less if you agree. Fossil fuels or chemicals added to tobacco all sponsor FRCn DARE Partnersips and the war protiteers. Fueling the jets leaving chemtrails or tanks and hummmers and bullets for profits. All unnecessary letting American farmers grow bio-diesel and utilizing the shelved alternatives from hydrogen fuel cells to electromagnatism of a Disney monorail. Stop the mad genociders...

This has been a public service message from the Sacramental cannabis food fuel fiber FARMaceutical Hardrug & Booze alternative campaign to end American Mass Destruction and stupidity!

Peace, Love and Liberty
DdC

The C-emical Manipulation of Human Consciousness
Down for construction...
http://schools.limestone.on.ca/sydhs/ChemicalManipulation.html
http://www.trufax.org/menu/chem.html

The Toxic Alternative to Natural Fiber
http://fornits.com/curiosity/hemp/fibre.htm

Monsanto and the drug war
http://www.corpwatch.org/issues/PID.jsp?articleid=669
http://www.guerrillanews.com/war_on_drugs/doc53.html
Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did, and it never will. Find out just what people will submit to, and you have found out the exact amount of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them; and these will continue until they are resisted with either words or blows, or with both. The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress.

Frederick Douglass, August 4, 1857

Organic Cannabis/Tobacco vs Chemical Cigarettes
http://pub3.ezboard.com/fendingcannabisprohibitionwhyitstimetolegalize.showMessage?topicID=310.topic

Psychology of Drug War Ads?
http://pub3.ezboard.com/fendingcannabisprohibitionwhyitstimetolegalize.showMessage?topicID=343.topic

OPEC Fossil Fuels vs Homegrown Biomass
http://www.angelfire.com/ca7/ddc/Fuel.html
More Biomass
http://www.journeytoforever.org

OPEC Fossil Fiber vs Homegrown Hemp
http://www.angelfire.com/ca7/ddc/Fiber.html

The Assassins of Youth DARE the FRCn PDFA
http://pub3.ezboard.com/fendingcannabisprohibitionwhyitstimetolegalize.showMessage?topicID=105.topic

The Toxic Alternative to Natural Fiber
http://fornits.com/curiosity/hemp/fibre.htm
****************************************************

Tobacco Radioactive, Pot Safer!
From: Sol Lightman verdant@student.umass.edu

The following is the text of a pamphlet I wrote for an organization at UMASS amherst

It is an attempt to point out some of the absurdities in the marijuana-is-bad-for-you-like-cigarettes bullshit, as well as take a few cheap (but well aimed) shots at the tobacco industry. It is written from a pro-marijuana-relegalization perspective,
and if you want a copy, mail us a Self Addressed Stamped Envelope. (we're poor.)

An address and some sources are at the end.

So, you thought it was the tar that caused cancer...

Think again. Cigarette companies will have you believing anything just as long as you continue to buy their products. The fact is, although insoluble tars are a contributing factor to the lung cancer danger present in today's cigarettes, the real danger is radioactivity. According to U.S. Surgeon General C. Everette Koop (on national television, 1990) radioactivity, not tar, accounts for at least 90% of all smoking related lung cancer.

Tobacco crops grown in the United States are fertilized by law with phosphates rich in radium 226. In addition, many soils have a natural radium 226 content. Radium 226 breaks down into two long lived 'daughter' elements -- lead 210 and polonium 210. These radioactive particles become airborne, and attach themselves to the fine hairs on tobacco leaves.

Studies have shown that lead 210 and polonium 210 deposits accumulate in the bodies of people exposed to cigarette smoke. Data collected in the late 1970's shows that smokers have three times as much of these elements in their lower lungs as non smokers. Smokers also show a greater accumulation of lead 210 and polonium 210 in their skeletons,though no studies have been conducted to link these deposits with bone cancer. Polonium 210 is the only component of cigarette smoke which has produced tumors by itself in inhalation experiments with animals.

When a smoker inhales tobacco smoke, the lungs react by forming irritated areas in the bronchi. All smoke produces this effect. However, although these irritated spots are referred to as
'pre-cancerous' lesions, they are a perfectly natural defense system and usually go away with no adverse effects. Insoluble tars in tobacco smoke can slow this healing process by adhering to
lesions and causing additional irritation. In addition, tobacco smoke causes the bronchi to constrict for long periods of time, which obstructs the lung's ability to clear itself of these
residues.

Polonium 210 and lead 210 in tobacco smoke show a tendency to accumulate at lesions in specific spots, called bifurcations, in the bronchi. When smoking is continued for an extended period of time, deposits of radioactivity turn into radioactive 'hot spots' and remain at bifurcations for years. Polonium 210 emits highly localized alpha radiation which has been shown to cause cancer. Since the polonium 210 has a half life of 21.5 years (Due to the presence of lead 210), it can put an ex-smoker at risk for years after he or she quits. Experiments measuring the level of polonium 210 in victims of lung cancer found that the level of 'hot spot'
activity was virtually the same in smokers and ex-smokers even though the ex-smokers had quit five years prior to death.

Over half of the radioactive materials emitted by a burning cigarette are released into the air, where they can be inhaled by non-smokers. In addition to lead 210 and polonium 210 it has been
proven that tobacco smoke can cause airborne radioactive particles to collect in the lungs of both smokers and non-smokers exposed to second hand smoke. Original studies conducted on uranium miners which showed an increased risk of lung cancer due to exposure to radon in smokers have been re-run to evaluate the radioactive lung cancer risk from indoor air radon. It turns out that tobacco smoke works as a kind of 'magnet' for airborne radioactive particles,
causing them to deposit in your lungs instead of on furniture. (Smoking indoors increases lung cancer risks greatly.)

It has been estimated that the total accumulated alpha radiation exposure of a pack-a-day indoor smoker is 38 to 97 rad by age 60. (Two packs a day yields up to 143 rad, and non-smokers
receive no more than 17 rad.) An exposure of 1 rad per year yields a 1% risk of lung cancer (at the lowest estimate.)

Don't smoke. Or if you do, smoke lightly, outdoors, and engage frequently in activities which will clear your lungs. Imported India tobacco has less than half the radiation content of that grown in the U.S.

Kicking the nicotine habit is not easy, and nobody has the right to expect it of you. Often physical addictions are reinforced by emotional and psychological needs. Filling or coming to terms with those needs can give you the inspiration and added freedom to succeed.

Most of all, inform yourself, even if the information is disturbing. You are a lot less likely to be taken in by tobacco advertising once you know the facts.

Nicotine, the active ingredient in tobacco smoke, has long been known to be highly addictive. In fact, doctors and pharmacologists are not in consensus as to which is more addictive -- nicotine, or heroin. Physical addiction occurs when a chemical becomes essential for the body or metabolism to function. In other words, a substance is said to be physically addictive if extended
use results in a build up of tolerance in the body to the extent that discontinuing use of the substance results in negative side effects. Called "withdrawal symptoms," these consequences can include anxiety, stress, trauma, depression and physical conditions such as shakes or nausea. It is to avoid these consequences that an addict will keep using his or her substance.

In addition to being addictive, nicotine is also a toxin (i.e. lethal if ingested in sufficient quantities.) Nicotine has been shown to have a negative effect on the heart and circulatory systems, causing a constriction in veins and arteries which may lead to a stroke or heart attack. In fact, nicotine is so poisonous that smokers who ignore their doctor's advice and continue to smoke while using dermal nicotine patches have managed to overdose and die of heart seizure.

Many people think smoking marijuana is just as harmful as smoking tobacco, but this is not true. Those who hold that marijuana is equivalent to tobacco are misinformed. Due to the efforts of various federal agencies to discourage use of marijuana in the 1970's the government, in a fit of "reefer madness," conducted several biased studies designed to return results that would equate marijuana smoking with tobacco smoking, or worse.

For example the Berkeley carcinogenic tar studies of the late 1970's concluded that "marijuana is one-and-a-half times as carcinogenic as tobacco." This finding was based solely on the tar content of cannabis leaves compared to that of tobacco, and did not take radioactivity into consideration. (Cannabis tars do not contain radioactive materials.) In addition, it was not considered that:
1) Most marijuana smokers smoke the bud, not the leaf, of the plant. The bud contains only 33% as much tar as tobacco.
2) Marijuana smokers do not smoke anywhere near as much as tobacco smokers, due to the psychoactive effects of cannabis.
3) Not one case of lung cancer has ever been successfully linked to marijuana use.
4) Cannabis, unlike tobacco, does not cause any narrowing of the small air passageways in the lungs.

In fact, marijuana has been shown to be an expectorant and actually dilates the air channels it comes in contact with. This is why many asthma sufferers look to marijuana to provide relief.
Doctors have postulated that marijuana may, in this respect, be more effective than all of the prescription drugs on the market.

Studies even show that due to marijuana's ability to clear the lungs of smog, pollutants, and cigarette smoke, it may actually reduce your risk of emphysema, bronchitis, and lung cancer. Smokers of cannabis have been shown to outlive non- smokers in some areas by up to two years. Medium to heavy tobacco smokers will live seven to ten years longer if they also smoke marijuana.

Cannabis is also radically different from tobacco in that it does not contain nicotine and is not addictive. The psychoactive ingredient in marijuana, THC, has been accused of causing brain
and genetic damage, but these studies have all been disproven. In fact, the DEA's own Administrative Law Judge Francis Young has declared that "marijuana in its natural form is far safer than many foods we commonly consume."

The disturbing thing about all of this information is that the majority of Americans are as yet unaware of the radioactive risk in cigarettes. In fact, many professionals: doctors, scientists and health administrators, either have never heard of polonium 210 or consider it to be just another scare story.

Why is this information so hard to come by? When the studies were first released in the late 70's, many magazines were unable to print articles because their main advertisers, cigarette companies, threatened to pull support if they published the facts. Although network news did pick up the story, virtually nothing came out in print. Those who heard were hard pressed to produce collaborating evidence, and were eventually convinced it was nothing to worry about.

The power of the cigarette industry to suppress information goes far beyond magazines, however. A well financed tobacco lobby has been very active in the United States Congress for
decades procuring subsidies and fighting laws and proposed research which could hurt the American tobacco industry. Tobacco interests practically own Senate and House seats, as many
campaign contributions come from cigarette profits. Tobacco pay- offs also go to fund organizations such as the Partnership For A Drug Free America, which adopt a harsh anti-drug agenda yet seem to omit alcohol and tobacco (claiming they are harmless.)

As an example, a 1984 law which was intended to require tobacco companies to release to the public a list of additives used in the manufacture of cigarettes was watered down to the extent that the list is now released only to the Department of Health and Human Services on the condition that it not be shown to anyone else. Companies have been known in the past to add
chemicals to cigarettes for flavor, and, many assert, for their addictive properties. In Britain such chemicals have included acetone and turpentine, as well as an assortment of known carcinogens.

Tobacco companies argue that revealing their 'secret ingredients' would hurt their competitiveness. In fact, when Canada passed legislation forcing additive lists to be released,
one large company reformulated its recipe for its Canadian distribution; another took its product out of Canada entirely.

Tobacco companies do not have the right to poison the public. Don't trust them. Get the information you need to make your own decisions, and restore government to the people.

Another destructive aspect of the Drug War is the unreasonable measures taken as a result of "reefer madness." Because of the long standing anti-pot-smoking paranoia begun in the 1930's, many law enforcement agencies have taken it upon themselves to censor and limit the marijuana culture through whatever channels they can find. This includes the banning of various forms of drug "paraphernalia" (pipes, clips, rolling papers, etc.)

Water pipes, or "bongs," are quite often the target of such efforts. Claiming that water pipes are constructed to allow marijuana smokers to inhale "dangerous" marijuana smoke deeper
into their lungs, many states and towns have passed laws controlling the sale, manufacture, and possession of these items for "health" reasons.

The sad fact is, water pipes have been shown to be extremely effective in removing harmful materials from smoke before it reaches the lungs. They also cool the smoke and prevent injury
and irritation to lung passages. In effect, laws against water pipes hurt all smokers, cannabis and tobacco, by preventing the development of safer forms of consumption.

Produced as a public service by the University of Massachusetts at Amherst Cannabis Reform Coalition Researched and written by Brian S. Julin
Corrections, comments, inquiries should be addressed to:

UMASS CANNABIS
S.A.O. Box #2
Student Union
UMASS Amherst, MA
01003

Sources:

(radioactivity)

o E.A. Martel, "Alpha Radiation Dose at Bronchial Bifurcations
From Indoor Exposure to Radon Progeny", Proceeds of the National Academy of Science, Vol. 80, pp. 1285-1289, March 1983.
o Naoimi H. Harley, Beverly S. Cohen, and T.C. Tso, "Polonium 210: A Questionable Risk Factor in Smoking Related Carcingenisis."
o "Radioactivity: the New-Found Danger in Cigarettes," Reader's Digest, March 1986.
o "Would You Still Rather Fight Than Switch?," Whole Life Times, Mid-April/May 1985.

(secret ingredients)

o "What Goes Up In Smoke?," Nation, December 23, 1991.

(marijuana)

o "The Emperor Wears No Clothes," Jack Herer, HEMP/Queen of Clubs Publishing, 1992

---------------------------------------------------------------------

More Research

Winters-TH, Franza-JR, Radioactivity in Cigarette Smoke,
New England Journal of Medicine, 1982;
306(6): 364-365 (reproduced w/o permission)

To the Editor: During the 17 years since the Surgeon General's first report on smoking, intense research activity has been focused on the carcinogenic potential of the tar component of cigarette smoke. Only one definite chmical carcinogen -- benzopyrene -- has been found. Conspicuous because of its absence is research into the role of the radioactive component of cigarette smoke.

The alpha emitters polonium-210 and lead-210 are highly con-centrated on tobacco trichomes and insoluble particles in cigarette smoke (1). The major source of the polonium is phosphate fertilizer, which is used in growing tobacco. The trichomes of the leaves con-centrate the polonium, which persists when tobacco is dried and processed.

Levels of Po-210 were measured in cigarette smoke by Radford and Hunt (2) and in the bronchial epithelium of smokers and nonsmokers by Little et al. (3) After inhalation, ciliary action causes the insoluble radioactive particles to accumulate at the bifurcation of segmental bronchi, a common site of origin of bronchogenic carcinomas.

In a person smoking 1 1/2 packs of cigarettes per day, the radia-tion dose to the bronchial epithelium in areas of bifurcation is 8000 mrem per year -- the equivalent of the dose to the skin from 300 x-ray films of the chest per year. This figure is comparable to total-body exposure to natural background radiation containing 80 mrem per year in someone living in the Boston area.

It is a common practice to assume that the exposure received from a radiation source is distributed throughout a tissue. In this way, a high level of exposure in a localized region -- e.g. bronchial epithelium -- is averaged out over the entire tissue mass, suggest- ing a low level of exposure. However, alpha particles have a range of only 40 um in the body. A cell nucleus of 5 to 6 um that is traversed by a single alpha particle receives a dose of 1000 rems. Thus, although the total tissue dose might be considered negligible, cells close to an alpha source receive high doses. The Po-210 alpha activity of cigarette smoke may be a very effective carcinogen if a multiple mutation mechanism is involved.

Radford and Hunt have determined that 75 per cent of the alpha activity of cigarette smoke enters the ambient air and is unab- sorbed by the smoker, (2) making it available for deposit in the lungs of others. Little et al. have measured levels of Po-210 in the lungs of nonsmokers that may not be accounted for on the basis of natural exposure to this isotope.

The detrimental effects of tobacco smoke have been considerably underestimated, making it less likely that chemical carcinogens alone are responsible for the observed incidence of tobacco-related carcinoma. Alpha emitters in cigarette smoke result in appreciable
radiation exposure to the bronchial epithelium of smokers and probably secondhand smokers. Alpha radiation is a possible etio- logic factor in tobacco-related carcinoma, and it deserves further study.

Thomas H. Winters, M.D.
Joseph R. Di Franza, M.D.
University of Massachesetts
Worcester, Ma 01605

Medical Center

1. Mertell EA. Radioactivity of tobacco trichomes and insoluble cigarette smoke particles. Nature. 1974; 249:215-7.
2. Radford EP Jr, Hunt VR. Polonum-210: a volatile radio-element in cigarettes. Science. 1964; 143:247-9
3. Little JB, Radford EP Jr, McCombs HL, Hunt VR. Distribution of polonium-210 in pulmonary tissues of cigarette smokers. N Engl J Med. 1965; 273:1343-51.

This letter was followed up by 5 letters which appear to support Winters and Di Franza and 2 letters which appear to not support them. I'm not about to type all those in along with the author's rebuttal, however.
Check out NEJM 307(5):309-313.
--
Lamont Granquist
lamontg@u.washington.edu
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Brief Prepared by UMASS CANNABIS verdant@titan.ucs.umass.edu
___________________________________________________

NEW YORK MEDICAL MARIJUANA PATIENTS' CO-OP: OUT AND PROUD

THE HERBALIST--The Unbroke Activist: lifelong Activist Kenneth Toglia Faces Jail Time for selling Medical Marijuana

Arrested for Giving Marijuana to the Sick, Kenneth Toglia Still Sows Seeds of Hope

When the cops arrested him this time, Kenneth Toglia was sitting down. It happened Wednesday, November 8, at a meeting of the New York Medical Marijuana Patients Cooperative, the buyers' club Toglia operates to sell marijuana to patients suffering from cancer, AIDS, MS, and glaucoma. The police tagged him with felony possession, a charge soon dropped to a misdemeanor.

Though the officers merely ticketed patients, Toglia says, they arrested two other volunteers of the cooperative, who were meeting in the narrow East Village walk-up at 130 East Seventh Street near Tompkins Square, and confiscated more than a pound of pot and a pile of oatmeal raisin cookies baked with cannabis oil, which give patients with lung disease an easier way to digest the substance.
http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v00.n1824.a08.html
____________________________________________________
More on Supreme Court Case--
http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v00.n1822.a02.html
___________________________________
Michigan Next for State Initiative--
http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v00.n1822.a06.html


Click Here to View 4381.jpg
View 4381.jpg



The Supremacy Clause and Federal Preemption
DdC

Registered on
Feb-20-2000
More User Info

Message #4382 posted by DdC (Info) June 01, 2003 04:04:10 ET
In Reply to: Hidden Weapons o Radioactive Mass Destruction posted by DdC (Info) June 01, 2003 03:45:59 ET

The Supremacy Clause and Federal Preemption
The issue: How should courts determine whether a federal law preempts state law?

Introduction

The preemption doctrine derives from the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution which states that the "Constitution and the laws of the United States...shall be the supreme law of the land...anything in the constitutions or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding." This means of course, that any federal law--even a regulation of a federal agency--trumps any conflicting state law.

Preemption can be either express or implied. When Congress chooses to expressly preempt state law, the only question for courts becomes determining whether the challenged state law is one that the federal law is intended to preempt. Implied preemption presents more difficult issues. The Court has to look beyond the express language of federal statutes to determine whether Congress has "occupied the field" in which the state is attempting to regulate, or whether a state law directly conflicts with federal law, or whether enforcement of the state law might frustrate federal purposes.

Federal "occupation of the field" occurs, according to the Court in Pennsylvania v Nelson (1956), when there is "no room" left for state regulation. Courts are to look to the pervasiveness of the federal scheme of regulation, the federal interest at stake, and the danger of frustration of federal goals in making the determination as to whether a challenged state law can stand.

In Silkwood v Kerr-McGee (1984), the Court, voting 5-4, found that a $10 million dollar punitive damages award (in a case litigated by famed attorney Gerry Spence) against a nuclear power plant was not impliedly pre-empted by federal law. Even though the Court had recently held that state regulation of the safety aspects of a federally-licensed nuclear power plant was preempted, the Court drew a different conclusion with respect to Congress's desire to displace state tort law--even though the tort actions might be premised on a violation of federal safety regulations.

Cipollone v Liggett Group (1992) was a closely-watched case concerning the extent of an express preemption provision in two cigarette labeling laws of the 1960s. The case was a wrongful death action brought against tobacco companies on behalf of Rose Cipollone, a lung cancer victim who had started smoking cigarette in the 1940s. The Court considered the preemptive effect on state law of a provision that stated "No requirement based on smoking and health shall be imposed under state law with respect to the advertising and promotion of cigarettes." The Court concluded that several types of state tort actions were preempted by the provision, but allowed other types to go forward. Perhaps the most interesting aspect of the case, from a constitutional standpoint, is the debate between justices over whether express preemption provisions should be read narrowly (a view adopted by seven justices) or read normally (a view favored by Justices Thomas and Scalia).

1950 tobacco ad starring Ronald Reagan.
http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/rrad.jpg

Cases
Silkwood v Kerr-McGee Corp. (1984)
http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/silkwood.html
Cipollone v Liggett Group (1992)
http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/cipollone.html

THE SUPREMACY CLAUSE
Article. VI.

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

Nuclear worker and labor activist Karen Silkwood. The Court found Silkwood's $10 million award against Kerr-McGee not to be preempted by federal law. Mystery still surrounds her death.
http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/silkwood1.jpg

Questions

1. Why would the framers insist that even the most insignificant federal regulations should trump even the most important of state constitutional provisions?

2. If a state makes criminal an action using language identical to language in a federal statute criminalizing the same action, is the state law preempted? Clearly, there would
be no conflict between federal and state law, but might state criminal enforcement jeopardize federal enforcement, or might the federal government be seen as having occupied the field of criminal enforcement? (See Pennsylvania v Nelson (1956), in which the Supreme Court found preempted a state sedition law virtually identical in its reach with the federal sedition law.)

3. If the federal government has occupied a field of regulation, for preemption purposes it becomes important to precisely identify the boundaries of that field. What suggestions to you have for how that inquiry ought to be conducted?

4. Don't punitive damages against a nuclear plant have the same practical effect as direct state regulation of the plant? What is the basis for finding the latter preempted but the former not in Silkwood?

5. How should we read federal statutes for preemption purposes? Should we read them normally, as Justices Thomas and Scalia contend, or should we read them narrowly ( a presumption against preemption) as the other justices in Cippollone argued?

Link Frontline Site on Silkwood Story
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/reaction/interact/silkwood.html
Book on the Silkwood story.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/reaction/interact/silkwood.html
http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/rashke.killing.gif


Click Here to View 4382.gif
View 4382.gif



Monsanto Cliarence/Dumsfeld Nutra-Poison
DdC

Registered on
Feb-20-2000
More User Info

Message #4383 posted by DdC (Info) June 01, 2003 04:16:08 ET
In Reply to: The Supremacy Clause and Federal Preemption posted by DdC (Info) June 01, 2003 04:04:10 ET

Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 07:15:57 -0400
From: "Robert Lederman" <robert.lederman@worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Fwd: Nutra-Poison
http://www.akasha.de/~aton/AspartamWpn.html

ASGARD INFO BANK ARCHIVES

NUTRA-SWEET THE ASPARTAME PENTAGON BIOLOGICAL WARFAREWEAPON

------------------------------------------------------------

Nutrapoison Part One by Alex Constantine

"I recognized my two selves: a crusading idealist and a cold, granitic believer in the law of the jungle. Edgar Monsanto Queeny, Monsanto chairman, 1943-63,
"The Spirit of Enterprise", 1934."

------------------------------------------------------------

The FDA is ever mindful to refer to aspartame, widely known as NutraSweet, as a "food additive"-never a "drug." A "drug" on the label of a Diet Coke might discourage the consumer. And because aspartame is classified a food additive, adverse reactions are not reported to a federal agency, nor is continued safety monitoring required by law.1 NutraSweet is a non-nutritive sweetener. The brand name is misnomer. Try Non-NutraSweet.

Food additives seldom cause brain lesions, headaches, mood alterations, skin polyps, blindness, brain tumors, insomnia and depression, or erode intelligence and short-term memory.

Aspartame, according to some of the most capable scientists in the country, does. In 1991 the National Institutes of Health, a branch of the Department of Health and Human Services, published a bibliography, *Adverse Effects of Aspartame*, listing not less than 167 reasons to avoid it.2 Aspartame is an rDNA derivative, a combination of two amino acids (long supplied by a pair of Maryland biotechnology firms: Genex Corp. of Rockville and Purification Engineering in Baltimore.)3 The Pentagon once listed it in an inventory of prospective biochemical warfare weapons submitted to Congress.4 But instead of poisoning enemy populations, the "food additive" is currently marketed as a sweetening agent in some 1200 food products.

In light of the chemo-warfare implications, the pasts of G.D. Searle and aspartame are ominous. Established in 1888 on the north side of Chicago, G.D. Searle has long been a fixture of the medical establishment. The company manufactures everything from prescription drugs to nuclear imaging optical equipment.5 Directors of G.D. Searle include such geopolitical heavy-hitters as Andre M. de Staercke, Reagan's ambassador to Belgium and Reuben Richards, an executive vice president at Citibank. Also Arthur Wood, the retired CEO of Sears, Roebuck & C disgorged by the clan of General Robert E. Wood, wartime chairman of the America First Committee.6 America Firsters, organized by native Nazis cloaked as isolationists, were quietly financed by the likes of Sullivan & Cromwell's Allen Dulles and Edwin Webster of Kidder, Peabody.7 Until the acquisition by Monsanto in 1985, the firm's chairman was William L. Searle, a Harvard graduate, Naval reservist and-a grim irony in view of aspartame's adverse effects-an officer in the Army Chemical Corps in the early 1950s, when the same division tested LSD on groups of human subjects in concert with the CIA.8 The chief of the Chemical Warfare Division at this time was Dr. Laurence Laird Layton, whose son Larry was convicted for the murder of Congressman Leo Ryan at Jonestown ("Come to the pavilion! What a legacy! "). Jonestown, of course, bore a remarkable likeness to a concentration camp, and kept a full store of pharmaceutical drugs. (The Jonestown pharmacy was stocked with a variety of behavior control drugs: qualudes, valium, morphine, demerol and 11,000 doses of thorazine-a better supply, in fact, than the Guyanese government's own, not to mention a surfeit of cyanide.9)

Dr. Layton was married to the daughter of Hugo Phillip, a German banker and
stockbroker representing the likes of Siemens & Halske, the makers of
cyanide for the Final Solution, and I.G. Farben, the manufacturer of a
lethal nerve gas put to the same purpose.10 Dr. Layton,a Quaker, developed a
form of purified uranium used to set off the Manhattan Project's first
self-sustaining chain reaction at the University of Chicago in 1942 by his
wife's German-born Uncle, Dr. James Franck. At Dugway Proving Ground in
Utah, Dr. Layton concentrated his efforts, as did I.G. Farben, on the
development of nerve gasses.11 Dr. Layton later defended his participation
in the Army's chemical warfare section: "You can blow people to bits with
bombs, you can shoot them with shells, you can atomize them with atomic
bombs, but the same people think there's something terrible about poisoning
the air and letting people breath it.

Anything having to do with gas warfare, chemical warfare, has this taint of
horror on it, even if you only make people vomit."12 Nazis and chemical
warfare are recurring themes in the aspartame story. Currently, the chief
patent holder of the sweetener is the Monsanto Co., based in St. Louis. In
1967, Monsanto entered into a joint venture with I.G. Farbenfabriken, the
aforementioned financial core of the Hitler regime and the key supplier of
poison gas to the Nazi racial extermination program. After the Holocaust,
the German chemical firm joined with American counterparts in the
development of chemical warfare agents and founded the "Chemagrow
Corporation" in Kansas City, Missouri, a front that employed German and
American specialists on behalf of the U.S. Army Chemical Corps.13 Dr. Otto
Bayer, I.G.'s research director, had a binding relationship with Monsanto
chemists.14 In the post-war period, Dr. Bayer developed and tested chemical
warfare agents with Dr. Gerhard Schrader, the Nazi concocter of Tabun, the
preferred nerve gas of the SS. Schrader was also an organophosphate pioneer,
and tested the poison on populated areas of West Germany under the guise of
killing insects.15 Schrader's experiments reek suspiciously of the ongoing
aerial application of malathion-developed by Dr. Schrader, a recruit of the
U.S.

Chemical Warfare Service when Germany surrendered-in present-day Southern
Califonia.16 Another bridge to I.G. Farben was Monsanto's acquisition of
American Viscose, long owned by the England's Courtauld family.

As early as 1928, the U.S. Commerce Department issued a report critical of
the Courtauld's ties to I.G. Farben and the Nazi party.17 Incredibly, George
Courtauld was handed an appointment as director of personnel for England's
Special Operations Executive, the wartime intelligence service, in 1940.18 A
year later, with the exhaustion of British military financial reserves,
American Viscose, worth $120 million was put on the block in New York. The
desperate British treasury received less than half that amount from the
sale, brokered by Siegmund Warburg, among others. 19 Monsanto acquired the
company in 1949.20 The Nazi connection to Monsanto crops up again on the
board of directors with John Reed, a former crony of "Putzi" Hanfstangl, a
Harvard-bred emigre to Germany who talked Hitler out of committing suicide
in 1924 and contributed to the financing of *Mein Kampf*. 21 Reed is also
chairman of Citibank and long a confederate of the CIA. According to a
lawsuit filed by San Francisco attorney Melvin Belli, Reed was an
instigator, with Ronald Reagan, James Baker and Margaret Thatcher, of the
"Purple Ink Document," a plan to finance CIA covert operations with wartime
Japanese gold stolen from a buried Philippine hoard.22 Other covert military
connections to Monsanto include Dr. Charles Allen Thomas, chairman of the
Monsanto Board, 1965[?]. Dr. Thomas directed a group of scientists during WW
Il in the refinement of plutonium for use in the atomic bomb. In the postwar
period Monsanto operated Tennessee's Oak Ridge National Laboratories for the
Manhattan Project.23 (Manhattan gestated with the Oak Ridge Institute for
Nuclear Studies, where Lethal doses of radiation were tested on 200 unwary
cancer patients, turning them into "nuclear calibration devices" gratis the
AEC and NASA, until 1974. 24) Nazi scientists and a 7,000 ton stockpile of
uranium were delivered to the Project by its security and
counter-intelligence director, Col. Boris Pash, a G2 designate to the CIA's
Bloodstone program-and the *eminence grise* of PB/7, a clandestine Nazi unit
that, according to State Department records, conducted a regimen of
political assassinations and kidnappings in Europe and the Eastern bloc.25
Monsanto Director William Ruckelshaus was an acting director of the FBI
under Richard Nixon, a period in the Bureau s history marred by COINTELPRO
outrages, including assassinations. Nixon subsequently appointed Ruckelshaus
to the position of EPA director, a nagging irony given his ties to industry
(Browning Ferris and Cummins Engine Co.). CIA counterintelligentsia on the
Monsanto board include Stansfield Turner, a former Director of Central
Intelligence, and Earle H. Harbison, an Agency information specialist for
nineteen years.

Harbison is also a director of Merrill Lynch, and thus raises the spectre of
CIA drug dealing. ln 1984 President Ronald Reagan's Commission on Organized
Crime concluded that Merrill Lynch employed couriers "observed transferring
enormous amounts of cash through investment houses and banks in New York
City to Italy and Switzerland. Tens of millions of dollars in heroin sales
in this country were transferred over seas." Merrill Lynch invested the drug
proceeds in the New bullion market before making the offshore transfers. 26
As might be expected in view of Monsanto's Nazi, chemical w are and CIA
ties, NutraSweet is a can of worms unprecedented in the American food
industry. The history of the product is laden with flawed and fabricated
research findings and, when necessary to further the product along, blatant
lies-the basis of FDA approval and the incredulity of independent medical
researchers.

Senator Metzenbaum described the FDA as "the handmaiden'' of the drug
industry in 1985, but she comports under all regimes. In the Clinton
administration for example, Mike Taylor was graced with the position of
deputy director of the FDA. Taylor is a cousin of Tipper Gore, Vice
President Albert Gore's wife, and once an outside counsel to Monsanto. (Gore
voted with Senate conservatives in 1985 against aspartame labelling.)

Under the tutelage of the Clinton administration, one Chicago reporter
quipped, the FDA strictly enforces one "unwritten" violation of law-failure
to bribe.

Granitic Believers

G.D. Sear!e, the pharmaceutical firm that introduced NutraSweet, worked
symbiotically with federal and congressional officials, bribed investigators
when violations of law were exposed, *anything* to move aspartame to market.
As far back as 1969, an internal Searle "strategy memo" concluded the
company must obtain FDA approval to outpace firms competing for the
artificial sweetener market. Another memo in December 1970 urged that FDA
officials were to be "brought into a subconscious spirit of participation"
with Searle.27 To that end, with enormous profits at stake, the
pharmaceutical house set out on a long struggle to transform the Pentagon's
biochemical warfare agent into "the taste Mother Nature intended.

The official story is that aspartame was discovered in 1966 by a scientist
developing an ulcer drug (not a "food additive").

Supposedly he discovered, upon carelessly licking his fingers that they
tasted sweet. Thus was the chemicals industry blessed with a successor to
saccharine, the coal-tar derivative that foundered eight years later under
the pressure of cancer concerns.

Aspartame found early opposition in consumer attorney James Turner, author
of *The Chemical Feast* and a former Nader's Raider. At his own expense,
Turner fought approval for ten years, basing his argument on aspartame's
potential side effects, particularly on children. His concern was shared by
Dr. John Olney, Professor of neuropathology and psychiatry at Washington
School of Medicine in St. Louis. Dr. Olney found that aspartame, combined
with MSG seasoning, increased the odds of brain damage in children.

Other studies have found that children are especially vulnerable to its
toxic effects, a measure of the relation between consumption and body
weight. The FDA determined in 1981, when the sweetener was approved, that
the maximum projected intake of Aspartame is 50 milligrams a day per
kilogram of body weight. A child of 66 pounds would consume about 23
milligrams by imbibing four cans of Diet Coke. The child might also
conceivably down an aspartame-flavored snack or two, nearing the FDA's
projected maximum dai