littlebigman
Registered on
Jun-21-2004
More User Info
|
Message #981 posted by littlebigman (Info) July 04, 2004 01:02:52 ET
**************************** FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE ***************************
INDEPENDENCE WEEKEND 2004
UNITED STATES FEDERAL JUDGE ISSUES SCHEDULING ORDER IN
"MOTHER OF ALL NINTH AMENDMENT CASES"
Sacramento, CA.
From the man the New York Post called, "Americas premiere grass roots activist", when he sent special delivery packages of pot to president Clinton, now comes an attack on the Bush administration with the filing of, as he calls it, "THE RIGHT TO GROW PLANTS" case.
Kiczenski says its,"time to end the war on folks natural ability to be self sufficient and independent".
Kiczenski also stated that,"anyone who gardens or farms will know what I'm talking about", and that,"the only thing that will keep this harsh reality from being understood by the general population is their ability to go to grocery stores, wall warts, and gas stations".
Kiczenski was also adamant in stating that,"this case is not about folks right to smoke pot, its about folks right to grow plants to survive, this case comes from my intent to grow hemp".
Kiczenski believes growing hemp would go a long way to solve the United States energy dependency, economic, and environmental problems because of hemp's high yields, and historic ability to be processed into raw material feed stocks that would, as he says,"directly compete with petroleum".
Kiczenski also cites a 1942 U.S.D.A film called,"HEMP FOR VICTORY", he says was used by the government during world war two, to convince farmers to grow hemp for the war effort.
"Hemp is four times more efficient than trees for making paper", Kiczenski says a U.S.D.A. bulletin concluded in a 1916.
Kiczenski then went on to state,
"The need, and right to grow plants is god given and naturally unavoidable.
The jurisdiction of this natural and self evident right falls only to the most harsh and balanced judge known, nature.
Only nature can ultimately decide if i can grow a plant or not.
Nature makes a clear judgment every year, no appeal.
As if god/nature's court wasn't tough enough, man has stepped in and somehow is pretending to have jurisdiction in this area.
The tragic, yet easily foreseeable result of this arbitrary assumption of jurisdiction has been as far reaching as ones thinking will allow and can only get worse if we allow it to continue.
Assuming the authority over the activity of growing plants may be a predictable consequence of living under the iron fisted rule of governments like the khmer rouge,(killing fields), but this is America, and we have the 9th amendment to protect us from such overreaching exercises in unnatural government authority.
No law can come between me and my natural ability to survive by god through nature, outside of commerce, on my own land, hurting no one, only to keep alive and maybe to grow a better life.
Folks can forget about their vegetable gardens, or for that mater, even they're right to live, because they've LOST THEIR RIGHT TO GROW PLANTS.
IF GOV CAN OUTLAW ONE PLANT, that translates in legal speak to, THEY CAN OUTLAW THEM ALL.
We have allowed government to assume their overreaching and unconstitutional jurisdiction.
The growing of plants goes to ones basic human rights,such rights are in fact protected
by our constitution by way of the first and ninth amendments."
He does not have the text of the case on the web yet, you can find it at the court house in Sacramento, eastern district, ca, 9th circuit, received by the court October 27 2003, but not filed by the court until November 4, 03,as Kiczenski vs Ashcroft {and friends}, CIV.S-03-2305.
its set for final pretrial hearing in This coming October.
|
